Popular Posts
-
Bench: S Sinha, Mark, E Katju CASE NO.: Appeal (civil) 5837 of 2006 PETITIONER: S.R. Batra and Anr. RESPONDENT: Smt. Taruna Batra DATE OF JU... -
Mammad Kunhi vs Rukhiya on 25 May, 1978 Equivalent citations: 1978 CriLJ 1645 Bench: P S Poti ORDER P. Subramonian Poti, J. 1. The petitione... -
NEW DELHI: Saying that the Dowry Prohibition Act grants protection from prosecution to a victim of dowry harassment, the Delhi high court ha... -
Mumbai, Feb 23: Observing that a wife who is financially independent cannot claim maintenance from her estranged husband, the Bombay High Co... -
Bench: S Sinha, Mark, E Katju CASE NO.: Appeal (civil) 5837 of 2006 PETITIONER: S.R. Batra and Anr. RESPONDENT: Smt. Taruna Batra DATE OF JU... -
Crl.M.C.No. 491/2009 Sanjay Bhardwaj & Ors. v. The State & Anr. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Reserve: 9th ... -
Quashing a False 498a FIR - tips and tricks ! Quashing of FIR is a tough matter ! Courts generally are reluctant to interfere at the stage o... -
Manjunathan Padmanabhan, a hardware engineer, spent three harrowing days in Parappana Agrahara, sharing cell space with thieves and murderer... -
“From the perusal of sub Section 4 of Section 125, if wife refused to live with her husband without any sufficient reason, she would not be ... -
New Delhi: In a rare judgment, probably the first for the Karkardooma courts, a session’s judge has ordered the prosecution of a man, who al...